News
Hosted on MSN2mon
Improving scientific research papers: Researcher outlines top ten pitfalls and how to avoid them
Aston University biostatistician Dr. Dan Green has identified the top ten errors he commonly sees in research papers in his work as a statistical reviewer for scientific and medical journals.
Rapid scientific advances are accelerating the development of medical innovations, from personalized treatments to curative ...
To help students understand the traditional structure of an introduction to a scientific paper. This exercise can focus on reading skills and comprehension, writing a research paper for a lab class or ...
A group of scientists who are experts at spotting fraudulent research outline five essential steps to combat industrialized scientific misconduct. Anna Abalkina is a research fellow at the Institute ...
A new paper points to an unexpected source for scientific censorship: scientists themselves. According to the paper, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences as a ...
Elisabeth Bik, a microbiologist by training, has become one of the world’s most influential science detectives. An authority on scientific image analysis who’s been profiled in The New Yorker for her ...
When a group of researchers at Northwestern University uncovered evidence of widespread—and growing—research fraud in scientific publishing, editors at some academic journals weren’t exactly rushing ...
Labbé receives funding from the European Research Council. He has also received funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR), and the U.S. Office of Research Integrity. Labbé has been in ...
Dr Dan Green is the lead author on an article outlining the top ten common statistical errors he sees when reviewing scientific papers These include implying causation from association, poorly ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results